I managed to establish basic model of the code number of a pyramid
and partially to decipher. As a result of long researches, I had
been established the following:
-
The pyramid is not a sepulcher of Pharaoh and
the purpose of its construction
was not on this plane.
-
Pyramid architectural parameters are of no
importance from a cryptographic point of view.
-
The cipher essence is hidden in the pyramid’s
geometric form.
-
The basic model of the Pyramid cipher was
established. The basic model of the code of a pyramid is formed
of 365 small pyramids which consist at 14 steps of model of the
code.
-
The numbers 365 and 14 are one of the cryptogram
decoding keys.
Note: The following is part of the book "Pyramids of the Great
Architect of the Universe" by Petros Petrosyan, presented here
with permission of the author. None of this content can be copied
without permission of the author.
Pyramids of the Great Architect of the Universe
SECRETS OF THE PYRAMIDS AND THE DAWN OF CIVILIZATION
by Petros Petrosyan
1. Who Built Pyramids in Giza?
Heretic Pharaohs of the Forth Dynasty
All year round, people of different professions gather around
the pyramids. The largest multitudes are, of course, tourists.
Those who have been to Giza once say that the first sight of the
pyramids surpasses description and expectation.

A view of the Giza pyramids

The plan
Pharaoh Snofru’s successor, his son Khufu, or Cheops, as the
Greeks used to call him, built a wonderful pyramid in Giza. The
initial height of that giant was ≈ 147 meters. Its base, before it
lost its outer casing, was ≈ 233 meters on all sides. The
sides of this pyramid slope at ≈ 52 degrees.

Cheops’ pyramid, cross-section
One hundred and twenty-seven years ago, Cheops’ pyramid was the
highest construction in the world; only in 1880 was it exceeded by
the towers of Koln Cathedral.
The second largest pyramid in Giza is Chaphra’s (Chephren)
pyramid. Its initial height was ≈ 143.5 meters. The sides of its
square base were 215.3 x 215.3 meters. The pyramid sides slope at
≈ 53–54 degrees.

Chephren pyramid, cross-section
Scholars and Egyptologists are not alone in their occupation
with the investigation of the pyramids. In 1969, Luis W. Alvarez,
winner of the Nobel Prize in physics in 1968, decided to explore
Chephren pyramid. “Chephren’s pyramid has not let out its secret
up to now; it appears indistinctly in the distance, like the
Sphinx at its foot,” states L.W. Alvarez before his experiment.
L.W. Alvarez was a professor in a California university. In
1969, with help from an American committee on atomic energy and
with support from the Egyptian government, Alvarez set space
radiation particle counters in the burial chamber of the pyramid,
hoping to take a shadow picture of the pyramid, as in
roentgenoscopy, and reveal hidden chambers. It would help discover
where the pharaoh’s mummy and treasures were hidden. Everything
went according to plan, but the expected vacuums were not
discovered. The smallest of the three royal pyramids in Giza
belongs to Pharaoh Mycerinus (Menkaure). The sides of its square
base are 108.4 x 108.4 meters. The initial height was
approximately 66 meters, the angle of its sides ≈ 51 deg.

Menkaure pyramid, cross-section
During the fourth dynasty, another pyramid was ordered
constructed by King Djedefre, one of the most mysterious persons
to sit an Egyptian throne. Opinions differ on whose successor King
Djedefre was. Djedefre’s pyramid was the most northern of all the
pyramids in Egypt. The sides of its square base were 100 x 100
meters. Its sides go up only ten meters. Very little is left of
Djedefre’s pyramid.
While pondering the question of who built Giza’s three famous
pyramids, we should note that Pharaohs Khufu, Khaphra, and
Menkaure were connected to them in Herodot’s records, although
their names were not often found in the Giza necropolis. For
clarity’s sake, it should be noted that pharaohs’ bodies were
never found in the pyramids of the third or fourth dynasties. No
signs of royal burial were discovered; some of them did even not
have any sarcophagi, as was the case with Huni in Maidum. There
was a sarcophagus in Sehemhet’s pyramid in Saqqara, sealed and
untouched. Burglars never managed to break in. However, when the
sarcophagus was opened, Pharaoh’s mummy was not in it.
The reader may ask if it is likely the builders used ten
million tons of stone to construct the pyramids in Giza, Dahshur,
Maidum, and Saqqara, the only goal of such mighty structures the
placing of an empty sarcophagus in an empty tomb. We’d like to
suggest another theory, which states that these monuments stood on
the plateau of Giza long before the appearance of the
civilization. Perhaps Pharaohs Khufu, Khaphra, and Menkaure added
only subsidiary constructions to the three great Giza pyramids.
Unlikely, but possible.
We wouldn’t like to exclude other possibilities. It can hardly
influence or clarify the question of the beginnings and purposes
of the pyramids. All the same, the evidence regarding who ordered
the pyramids built, when, and what their goals were is
questionable and gives us no clarity concerning either their
beginnings or their predestination.
The last lord of the fourth dynasty, Pharaoh Shepseskaf, ordered
built a tomb for him in the form of mastaba, “the pharaoh’s
mastaba.” The pharaoh’s decision startled his contemporaries,
scholars, and Egyptologists.
Everybody asked the same questions. Why wasn’t Shepseskaf
buried like other representatives of the fourth dynasty? Why
wasn’t he buried next to Cheops and Chephren? Why did Shepseskarf
choose to place his tomb where neither the pyramids of Giza nor
Dahshur could be seen? And finally, why did the king choose a
mastaba and not a pyramid?
We shall attempt to answer these questions, comparing our
viewpoint with the official one. We may assume that his choice of
tomb and the place of his burial lie in his desire to differ from
his predecessors.
But why? We believe that during the struggle for the
superiority in religious and ideological harmony, Shepseskaf sided
with the priests of the highest echelon, who were against the
pharaohs building a geometrically regular pyramid, considering it
a blasphemy against the gods.
Shepseskaf’s decision to build a mastaba was an abrupt turn
backwards, the result of a violent ideological struggle in the
highest echelons of the government and religious powers of Egypt,
a violent struggle for truth.
According to Herodot, Egypt became weak due to the third and
fourth dynasties’ pharaohs’ dissipation, egoism, and pyramid
building. The majority of the pharaohs of the third and fourth
dynasties compared themselves to the sun god, Ra. Almost all the
information about the pyramids Herodotus obtained from the priests
of the Sais temple while they were in opposition with the
pharaohs. Though more than thousand years had passed since the
opposition and Herodotus’ appearance in Egypt, the Sais priests
must have discredited the names of these rulers because after
Pharaoh Snofru, most of the rulers of the fourth dynasty were
considered heretics, although Herodot kept silent on the matter.
The truth lies in the pharaohs’ apparent confrontation with the
priests.
During the reign of these kings, the main Egyptian god was the
sun god, Ra, especially revered in Heliopolis. Ra’s name was part
of the pharaoh’s titles: Khaf-ra, Djedef-ra, and Menkau-ra.
Herodotus was initiated into the secret doctrine, belonging to the
priest caste, and manifested sharpness towards the above-mentioned
pharaohs, as noticed in his records. Not by chance. These
pharaoh-heretics were the ones who requested the geometrically
regular pyramids, the first to resist the will of the priests and
demand the right to build true pyramids.
A chaotic state ensues right after Pharaoh Djoser’s reign. Most
likely, other pharaohs opposed the priests, but no record of it
has been preserved in history. We believe the pharaohs withstood
the supremacy of priestly wisdom, and acknowledged them as their
teachers. The situation was radically changed with the conquest of
Upper Egypt and the unification of the state. Pharaoh, having the
title of a highest ranked priest, communicated the mysteries and
holy knowledge of the priest caste. In due time, he wanted to
combine state and religious power in his hands. The pharaohs no
longer wanted to be the pupils. This struggle can be followed
throughout the history of Ancient Egypt. Because of such
struggles, Egypt was sometimes controlled by dynasties of
priest-rulers. Obviously, Pharaoh Shepseskaf sided with the
priests, which is why he didn’t build a pyramid. Shepseskaf
strived to discredit his predecessors, as if calling the pyramid
constructors heretics.
This idea is supported by the fact that, right after assuming
the throne, King Userkaf ordered a pyramid built for himself,
closing all paths leading back to the old.
2. Astronomical Orientation of the Pyramids
Now we would like to talk about one of the more compelling
mysteries of the pyramids—their exact astronomical orientation.
From different sources, we know that pyramids are oriented towards
the cardinal points. Except for isolated pyramids, including
Djoser and Sahure, the deviations of the south-north axis don’t
exceed one degree.
Ancient Egyptians deliberately oriented pyramids with the
cardinal points, and somehow, they had the knowledge and skill to
achieve exact orientation. Religious beliefs held that the spirit
of the king, after his death, soared to the skies, to the stars,
where he occupied the place over the North Pole. In accordance
with this, all entrances in the pyramids of the Old Kingdom face
north. Clearly, Ancient Egyptians were aware of celestial objects
and their patterns, if they were able to use them to orient their
monuments.
One of the latest hypotheses to attempt to solve the problem is
based on a 1993 discovery made proving that the Giza necropolis
had been built according to a plan demanding the exact orientation
of the three pyramids, not only to each other, but to the river
Nile, modeling on a huge scale the celestial phenomenon.
Some explorers believe the abovementioned hypothesis is able to
explain not only the reason behind the astronomical orientation,
but also what we consider more surprising—the fundamental
arguments on which builders determined the size of each pyramid.
The author of this discovery was Robert Bauval, a Belgian engineer
and builder.
Bauval discovered that the moment the stars forming part of
Orion cross the Giza meridian, they are arranged in the southern
sky almost along a straight line, but only almost. Two lower
stars, Alnitak and Alnilam, make a perfect square diagonal, while
the third star, Mintaka, is displaced to the left of the observer,
i.e. to the east.

Bauval’s diagram
Bauval thought that on the plan of the Giza necropolis, the
Great Pyramid of Cheops corresponded to the position of Alnitak.
The Chepren pyramid corresponds to the position of Alnilam, and
Mikerin’s pyramid, displaced to the east, corresponds to the
position of Mintaka. Here, Bauval sees a diagram of that part of
the sky, which corresponds to Orion.

In Bauval’s opinion, the three pyramids belonging to the fourth
dynasty pharaohs of ancient Egypt in reality are a map of thee
stars of Orion, not only their mutual disposition, but in their
relative dimensions they characterize the size of the star.
According to the Belgian engineer, pyramids and other monuments of
the Giza necropolis are situated in such a way that they form the
starlit sky of 10450 B.C., but not the map corresponding to the
fourth dynasty, about 2500 B.C.
The starlit sky is not constant. It changes all the time
because of the equinox precession. Thus, we may conclude that the
three Giza pyramids were built not by fourth dynasty rulers, but
by persons unknown, and that during the reign of Cheops, Chephren,
and Mikerin, they had already been standing on the Giza Plateau
for almost 8000 years.
In spite of the originality of this hypothesis, it has some
holes: if we admit that the three Giza pyramids reflect the part
of the sky corresponding to the three stars of Orion, what is
reflected by the disposition of pyramids in Saqqara or Abusir, or
the rest of the stars forming the part of Orion constellation? It
is natural to suppose that ancient Egyptians assigned roles to
these three stars. And what about the rest? Is it likely they
built some of pyramids to reflect celestial realities and others
without any plan? It is doubtful. One shouldn’t see the purpose of
pyramid as based solely upon its geometric dimensions. Nor should
one assume that the Giza pyramids are more important than are any
others simply because two of the largest examples make their home
on the plateau. The size of these monuments have place in the
investigation of their building or of the purpose of the pyramids.
As an example, we have three lines. In one line, we’ll arrange
three pyramids of different sizes; in another line, three A’s,
again of different sizes; and in the third, three figure 2’s.
1.

2.
A
A
A
3.
2
2
2
Clearly, a change of size does not influence the content. Let’s
give a primitive arithmetical equation:
2 + 2 = ?
Ask anybody to answer the question. Educated
people, without exception, will answer the same way:
2 +
2 = 4.
By enlarging the size of the 2, we don’t change its
quantitative essence. Two plus two equals four, no matter how big
the two is. This reasoning works the same with other conventional
symbols. Independent of its size, the meaning and essence of the
word “Abydos” won’t change:
Abydos or Abydos or
Abydos
The existence of dozens of pyramids in Egypt, each differing
from the others in its geometric design demonstrates that the size
of the pyramid does not play an essential role in the issue. If
three different persons are shown pictures of three geometrically
correct pyramids of different sizes and asked to share their
impressions, one can be sure that the three have still seen
geometrically correct pyramids, independent of their sizes. For
the majority of our readers, the essence of the secret may be
discovered using factual peculiarities arising from the geometric
form of the pyramid.
3. PYRAMIDOLOGISTS AND PYRAMIDOLOGY
Many mysteries connected with the pyramids are still under the
pressure of orthodox Egyptology. While official science is right
and logical in many aspects, there exist problems that require a
different approach. Charles T. Russel was the founder of the
Society of the Watch Tower. Pastor Russel stated that Egyptian
pyramids held divine prophetic secrets known only to him. Only by
studying his books could everybody understand the divine secrets
of the pyramid. He considered his doctrine inspired by God, but of
terrestrial origin. Pyramidologists used complicated measurements
to uncover hidden secrets of the pyramids, trying to connect those
measurements with events in Christianity.
Numerology controlled the numbers, trying to learn the hidden
meanings of the pyramid. Pastor Russel wrote:
That day Jehovah will display himself as a Great Savior, and
he has already assigned the pyramid part of the work to convince
the world in his wisdom and providence. It will be an additional
confirming evidence of the Great Pyramid to God’s written word;
it will be a new reason for the rejoicing of true believers. The
testimonies of that witness will present humankind new, fresher
grounds for the strengthening of faith.
That stone “witness” preserved by a thousand-year silence
must speak at last. The true believers are privileged by seeing
and hearing the testimonies of that stone witness before the
secular (mundane) opinion are ready to evaluate it.
We can’t doubt that this ancient structure was repeatedly
mentioned in the Holy Scripture as “God’s witness on the land of
Egypt.” Only when we entered the time named in Daniel’s
prophecy, “the time of the End,” when knowledge shall be
increased and the wise shall understand God’s plan (Daniel 12:4,
9, 10), will the Great Pyramid’s secrets become comprehensible;
only then will all the questions get a reasonable answer.
Commenting on the importance of that “witness,” Reverend Joseph
Seis expresses the following idea:
There is a greater idea embodied in that splendid structure.
Of his five points, there is the one in which all his sides and
outside lines are completed. This is the corner of the summit
meeting that raises his solemn forefinger to the sun.
Practically, the king of fame has arrived and the overwhelming
majority of true believers must rejoice. Every inch of that
massive structure eloquently announces the wisdom, strength, and
elegance of our Lord.
The testimony of that witness, like God’s written word, will
point out with solemn and faultless exactness the final
destruction of the old order of things on the earth.
See the picture

On Pastor Russell’s grave, a note was left pronouncing Pastor
Russel an “Envoy of the Church of Laodician,” or “angel of the
Church of Laodician” as marked in St. John 3:14. The Society of
the Watch Tower, in honor of Pastor Russell, set up a memorial in
the form of a pyramid. That pyramid is evidence of Pastor Russell
and his followers’ attempts to ignore the works of “pyramidomaniacs.”
Pyramidologists touch on questions not investigated by orthodox
Egyptologists. Many believe they abuse the discoveries of
Egyptologists, damaging the cause of understanding. In his work
Mysteries of Egyptian Pyramids, Lower devoted two chapters to
pyramidologists. Vandier, in his Manual on Egyptian Archeology,
dedicated a whole part to this question. Capar, in Memphis in
the Shadow of Pyramids, characterized the pyramidologists as
inventors of a systematization of digital mysticism generating a
“religion of pyramids.” Zhekier names all this “gibberish fruit of
human mind and fantasy” in his article “The So-called Mysteries of
the Great Pyramid.” But he, too, considers it necessary “to guard
the world public against this gibberish supported by
pseudoscientific reasonings.” Borchardt concludes his lecture,
“Against digital mysticism ‘round the Great Pyramid in Giza” with
the following words: “To tell the truth, one doesn’t know whether
to feel sorry for the author or condemn the publisher for
spreading such rot and nonsense.” Erman, in Pharaohs’ Egypt,
writes, “Even in our days, one can still witness outbursts of such
gibberish, though, it seems a whole century of research should
have made them vanish a long time ago.” According to
Egyptologists, pyramidologists are united in their arrogant
attitude towards official science and contempt for its data. In
1872, Mariette wrote, “Many disputes were held concerning the
purpose of pyramids but, only the pyramid of Cheops served as a
starting point for those fabrications. We would like to draw your
attention to the fact that it is baseless to believe that all
other pyramids, more than sixty in number, had a different purpose
than the pyramid of Cheops.”
In 1922, Borchardt wrote “The Great Pyramid, to which all these
theories based on numbers and dimensions refer, contains no
mystery at all. Among many of the kind, it is one of the
sepulchers and is no different from others. Even the dimensions of
that pyramid can’t serve as a basis for distinguishing it among
others as is constantly being done.” This explanation is logical,
acceptable, and convincing in is clearness.
John Taylor, the author of the 1859 book The Great Pyramid:
Why Was It Built and Who Built It? is considered the founder
of pyramidology. He asserts that the level of mathematical,
astronomical, and architectural knowledge was so low that human
beings could not have built it and “thus it follows that
inevitably God must have helped them by inspiring them with all
his knowledge.” He had never visited Egypt, and he was neither an
Egyptologist nor an engineer, just a retired publisher. However,
in the atmosphere of British Israelism, his theory flourished.
Numerous articles have been written disproving pyramidology and
the idea that the Great Pyramid was constructed under the mystic
guidance of God, but many people continue to believe that the
Great Pyramid is evidence of God embodied in stone and refer to
the Bible where, they claim the pyramid is mentioned as God’s
evidence. In Isaiah19:19-20, the following is written: “In that
day shall there be an altar to the LORD in the midst of the land
of Egypt, and a pillar at the border thereof to the LORD, And it
shall be for a sign and for a witness unto the LORD of hosts in
the land of Egypt.” Many people still believe that the Great
Pyramid was built according to a plan inspired by God.
Was the pyramid really constructed under the guidance of God?
To answer the question, we must consider all arguments. The old
wisdom reads, “Ideas are worthless if they can’t be verified and
supported by confirming evidence.” But until the true purpose of
the pyramids is proven, opinions will differ.
Taylor’s theory became attractive after Charles Piazzi Smith,
the Royal astronomer, paid attention to it. Smith’s natural
originality, Scottish Puritanism, and his desire to find ties
between Great Britain and the Bible caused him to fully accept
Taylor’s theory. His book, Our Heritage in the Great Pyramid,
became very popular. However, Taylor’s theory was disproved
unexpectedly. A formerly devoted student of Smith’s went to
Egypt in 1880–1882 to record exact measurements that would help
him support Egyptology. According to Egyptologist Mendelson’s
conclusion, “He made a brilliant and exclusively precise
triangulation (dividing into triangles) of the Giza area, which
showed Smith’s measurements as incorrect and that there was no
ground to support his theory.” This young man was Mathew Flinders
Petry, and he later became a prominent Egyptologist.
The weakest point of Taylor’s theory is that he bases it only
on the pyramid of Cheops. Taylor’s theory treated other pyramids
as though they did not exist. Egyptologists couldn’t agree with
that. The pyramid of Chephren is only a few meters shorter than
that of Cheops. Constructed on higher ground, the pyramid of
Chephren looks a little taller than the pyramid of Cheops.
Archeological investigations have proved that the Great Pyramid is
only the sepulcher of Pharaoh Cheops. Some don’t agree. According
to Egyptologists, the Great Pyramid had always imbued reasoning
people to generate all kinds of theories, but academic Egyptology
believes Taylor had the right to formulate his own hypothesis.
Many researchers think otherwise.
Taylor wrote, “God had presented and materialized in it
fundamentals of mathematical and geometric knowledge to preserve
them for the ages for those able to understand and make use of
them.” Taylor’s main task while studying pyramids was to determine
the units of measurement used by their constructors. We think he
made a mistake. The majority of Taylor’s followers left the
grounds of Christian religion, though not the Bible. Some
pyramidologists called the Great Pyramid “a stone Bible,” where
you could read all wisdom—the past and future of humankind. You
have just to be able to read it. But how? Some preferred the
mathematical approach, others the mystical one. Many never
revealed the method of their research and concealed from the world
even the results of their investigations.
J.R. Skinner was convinced that the Great Pyramid’s dimensions
expressed the ancient wisdom found in old Jewish texts. Skinner’s
book, Key to the Hebrew-Egyptian Mystery of Measure Source
was published in 1894.
E. Shourier, in The Great Devotees, tells us that in
Egypt there existed “secret religious adherents” striving to
declare a “different scientific synthesis code” known as Osiris
(“spiritual sovereign”) and that the Great Pyramid was its symbol
and mathematical gnomon.” (A gnomon is an ancient astronomical
instrument.) Barbarain, in The Great Pyramid Secret and the End
of Adam’s World (1936), and H.P. Blavatsky in Isis Unveiled
(1877) and The Secret Doctrine (1888), deviated from
Christianity and Judaism’s figure symbolism and mathematics. Their
thoughts were based on mystic methods. Barbarain believes there is
not a single branch, section, direction, volume, slope, or
projection without exalted and definite importance in the Great
Pyramid. Barbarain is convinced that the outer contours of the
Great Pyramid reveal “the fundamental universal formula.”
Blavatsky came to the same conclusion: “The outer contours of
the Great Pyramid simultaneously illustrate principles of
geometry, mathematics, astrology, and astronomy.”
One of Taylor’s followers was Scotch royal astronomer Ch. P.
Smith, born in 1819, in Naples. His father was a British admiral.
In 1845, he was became an Edinburgh University professor, and in
1854 he became a member of the Royal Society, but after twenty
years, he renounced the title because the Royal Society refused to
support his interpretation of the Great Pyramid. He wrote, “Of
course it was not a sepulcher; it was a mysterious measures and
weights compendium inspired by God and…All the knowledge disclosed
to the mankind by God. One has simply to correctly interpret the
secrets of the pyramid, though not with the help of certain
abstract speculations, but with the help of mathematics.” We
believe Smith was right. Noetling, a German war prisoner, after
becoming acquainted with Smith’s works in Australia, in 1921
published a book entitled Space Figures of Cheops Pyramid: a
Mathematical Key to Single Laws of the Universe. He was
attempting to prove that if using the Egyptian cubit, the side of
the pyramid will equal “the most exact duration of the solar
year.” Noetling calculated the atomic mass of separate chemical
elements known to Egyptians and found them encoded in the Great
Pyramid. D. Davidson discovered the “displacement factor,” with
which he could calculate whatever he liked. The overwhelming
majority of pyramidologists, in attempting to solve the pyramid
mysteries, frequently applied all kinds of mathematical
interpretations connected with the geometric parameters of the
Great Pyramid. Each time, they appeared further away from the real
solution.
In his book, Reminiscences of Future, Erich von Däniken
treats pyramids with great consideration. He thinks the pyramid is
one of the numerous enigmas of the past. He believes that new
scientists should revisit the enigma. In March 1972, Däniken
proclaimed himself a messiah and prophet who would turn upside
down the doubtful order established on the earth. But first, he
negates the idea that the pyramid was a sepulcher. “I don’t
suppose that there will be someone eccentric enough to believe
that the pyramid served just as a sepulcher for some kind of
monarch.” The pyramid of Cheops “is a monument to the
inconceivable past of humanity.” In another part of the book, we
read, “As to the construction of the pyramid, we have not been
given the answer to the questions concerning the method,
destination, and epoch connected with it. We are facing an
artificial hill about 150 meters high with some million tons of
weight. And they say that this colossus is nothing more than the
sepulcher of an ordinary ruler! Let whoever can believe it.”
4. Insufficiency of Material Argumentation
Representatives of mysticism were united by the common
conviction that the pyramid could not have been a sepulcher. As
representatives of science confirm, almost all the pyramidologists
treat Egyptology and its data with contempt. The great majority of
pyramidologists mention only one pyramid—the Great Pyramid of Giza.
Explorers vary in opinions, but over the last two hundred years,
Egyptologists and archeologists have done a great deal of work and
the knowledge at their disposal is indisputable and subject to
thorough research. Exploration of this knowledge will enable us to
restore the scenery of different epochs and social-cultural
development of Egypt. With the help of Egyptology, we’ll be able
to follow the religious path followed by Egyptians in different
epochs, as well. Now an attempt will be made to unite these two
points of view.
The numerous new theories and judgments about the true purpose
of pyramids are necessary to consider. Only the study of these
theories will give any estimation of the material. Initiators of
all theories were convinced that Pharaoh Cheops’ pyramid could not
have been a mere sepulcher, and an overwhelming majority of them,
based on their own measures, interpretations, and comments, lift
the mysterious veil of the Great Pyramid. However, some
researchers believe that the mystery is hidden in the pyramid’s
geometric form. Without giving evidence in support of their
versions, they were content with interpretations of philosophical
character. J. Barbarain, in his work The Mystery of the
Great Pyramid and the End of Adam’s World (1935) suggests,
“Outer contours of the Great Pyramid express the main formula of
the universe.” H.P. Blavatsky arrived at almost the same
conclusion, but like Barbarain, was content with interpretations
of the same character: “In its outer forms, the Great Pyramid
symbolizes the principles underlying natural creation,
simultaneously illustrating the principles of geometry,
mathematics, astrology, and astronomy.” We are convinced that had
researchers supported their suggestions with concrete argument and
facts, orthodox science would be convinced. The weakest point of
pyramidologists is the lack of material arguments. And even if
they exist, they are not convincing.
The absence of arguments converts suggestions into
beautiful-sounding sets of ideas that do not influence official
beliefs. Neither the representatives of Egyptology nor those of
science are able to refute or confirm statements and conclusions.
In consequence, when coming across a similar idea, scientists just
smile and ignore it.

View of Giza pyramids

The author and pyramid cipher presupposed
model

5. HERMES IS THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN GOD THOTH
Cyril of Alexandria (fourth century AD) regarded the Egyptian
god Thoth as the first of those confessing Holy Trinity. Some
explorers maintain that Thoth came to Egypt immediately after
Atlantis perished. Plato mentions the disaster in the year 9700
BC.

Thoth, God of Wisdom
Thoth is considered the inventor of the Egyptian alphabet,
after which he was worshipped as the god of writing. During his
lifetime, he was revered as an unsurpassed philosopher, orator,
athlete, and musician. He acquainted Egyptians with physics,
mathematics, alchemy (Hermetics), and astrology. Hermes lengthened
the calendar sun year from 360 to 365 days. For these and other
reasons, he was called “Trismegistus,” which meant “thrice
greatest.” His works underlay Egyptian mysteries and laid a
foundation for Hermeticism in honor of the first teacher, sent by
God himself. After his death, his doctrine was called Hermetical,
and acquired magic force.
We assume that the construction of pyramids in Egypt is most
probably connected with Hermes, he being God’s envoy, able to pass
from Atlantians to Egyptians the most important achievements of
their civilization. During cataclysms, when even the mere
existence of life is under suspicion, people attempt to preserve
for posterity only the most essential knowledge, believing that
everything else could be relearned. Hermes brought to Egyptians
the knowledge, which became the purpose of the secret doctrine and
the pyramids. They were obviously trying to warn us about the
threat of civilization destruction, hidden in the pyramid cipher.
They realized that only after thousands of years would man’s
descendents again come to understand the essence of the pyramids.
Just imagine if this was the case—if recorded in the geometry
of the pyramid was the predictions of eminent catastrophe. We
would be able to estimate our destruction. Ciphered pyramid
knowledge can help us display both attention and care for the
perspective revealed in pyramid cipher study. Soon, cryptography
will present our suggested pyramid mathematical model. That will
be a real revolution. Human beings will strive to possess ciphered
information, enabling our civilization to begin a new phase of its
development. Roads will open before man, making him the possessor
of the keys to heaven’s gates. We still have a ways to go yet, and
for the time being, people and countries still compete with each
other. In one of his 700 quatrains, Michel de Nostradamus
(1503-1566) writes about the end of the twentieth century:
The world is expecting the Lord of light and knowledge,
It seemed he would never come,
Expectations pave Hermes’ road,
And the Eastern genius revives in love.
Interpreters are convinced it means that at the end of the
twentieth century, mankind will understand Hermes’ secret doctrine
and a thousand-year-old secret will become a reality.

Pyramid cipher principal model. Fourteen
steps, top view
Fourteen-step model HPC is formed of 365 small pyramids


THE CONTENT IS HIDDEN IN THE CONTOURS OF THE FORM
Based on our definition, pyramids should be grouped according
to their form. Then we shall discuss where and how these forms
appeared. We believe that all pyramids, except geometrically
correct ones, are false (“dummies”), serving only to distract
investigators. Making use of the suggested system, you will see
that the geometric organization of ecumenical ciphers of already
researched stars presented themselves as “pseudopyramid”
(pyramidal) geometric bodies. Here is a table of geometric
peculiarities of ten of the best-known pyramids in Egypt:

The table clearly shows that there is no consistency in the
geometric peculiarities of these ten pyramids. The heights, bases,
and side inclination angles of these pyramids are not connected
and should not be given much importance. We think that each of the
“burial vaults” was
constructed primarily as a temple and only secondly as a
pharaoh’s sepulcher. The pyramid’s secret is sooner connected with
dimension than form. We continued the search for the secret by
investigating peculiarities of the pyramid’s geometric form. The
logical conclusion of the comparative analysis can be that all
these objects are pyramids. The Cheops pyramid, indeed a world
wonder—imagine that you are standing at its foot. It is 146.7
meters tall, and its base sides are 232.4 meters. One hundred and
twenty-seven years ago, it was the highest erection in the world.
Its volume is 2,641,100 cubic meters. About 2,400,000 stone blocks
were used for its construction. Its total weight is estimated at
6,500,000-7,000,000 tons. What does all of this have to do with
our questions?
We assert that the only reason pyramid form has such value is
because a proportional change of a pyramid’s geometric parameters
doesn’t change the definition of the given figure. The existence
of 73 different pyramids in Egypt gave impetus to the idea that to
carry out an effective analysis of these structures we must group
them first according to form similarity and then according to
dimensional differences. Meanwhile, we’ll regard only
geometrically correct pyramid, those with a square base and
equilateral triangle sides.

Solar system model
THE MAGIC NUMBER 14 OR THE KEYS FFROM THE HEAVENLY GATES
INFORMATION ON CONSERVATION LAW AND THE IMMORTALITY OF THE
HUMAN SOUL
In works connected with the hypothetical cipher of the pyramid,
we have used thousands of identical, correct, small pyramids. The
discovery of the cipher is of principal importance, because
without it, deciphering loses its concrete basis. After many
different arrangements of these pyramids, we concentrated our
attention on the model of the pyramid formed of fourteen steps.
Later, it will be possible to observe that the sum of small
pyramids (contained in all 14 steps), which constitute the sides
of the Great Pyramid equals 365. The number 365 is one of the keys
for deciphering the coded information. Based on the results of our
research, we concluded that the fourteen-step model of the pyramid
is a principal copy of the mathematical cryptogram, lost by
humanity during the last universal catastrophe.

Basic model of the prospective code of a pyramid Code 365 – 14
- 5
And finally, the most intriguing:
Based on Biblical information, we established that Noah’s flood
was the eighth and last world catastrophe (see 2 Peter 2:5). It is
written that Noah lived in the eighth world. Our civilization is
the ninth. Why, from numerous versions, have we chosen the 14-step
pyramid model? We dug through thousands of pages of literature in
the hopes of finding something useful for our work.

We looked for corresponding information with great patience and
our efforts were not in vain. Our attention was attracted by the
Vasilidian doctrine (one of the Gnostic sects of Vasilid in Syria,
second c. AD). Abraksas was the highest ruler of the heavens. In
the Vasilidian system, the sum of numerical meanings of letters
contained in the word Abraksas is 365 (the sum of seven Greek
letters,
Abraxaz:
1+2+100+1+60+1+200 = 365). As we know, a year consists of 365
days. In Genesis 5:23-24 it is said that Enoch, son of Jared,
lived 365 years and God took him. Among the holy and divine
numbers, the figure 14 (2 x 7) is the most common. The number 14
is represented as a total expression of terrestrial and celestial
mythological personages.
Remember the words of evangelist St. Matthew that all the
generations from Abraham until David are fourteen generations, and
from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen
generations, and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ
are fourteen generations.
In ancient Egyptian legends, it is said that Osiris, after being
killed, was dismembered into fourteen parts. According to Egyptian
doctrine, the goddess of nature, Maat, formed the seasons. At that
time, the solar year was equal to the lunar, both having twelve
months or 360 days. Ra, infuriated with the goddess of heaven,
Nut, cursed all 360 days of the solar year. Nut would stay sterile
all her life. But the god of reason, Thoth, helped her. He cheated
the lunar goddess, taking five days from her and devoting them to
Ra. Nut gave birth to five children.
The first was Osiris (Light or Spirit), who enlightened the
universe. The second was Gor (boundary between the body and the
soul). The third became Seth (Tifon, or Ignorance, or what is
lower than the soul in Greek). The fourth child was Goddess Isida
(Knowledge), and the fifth was Neftida (Victory). Some time later,
Seth decided to kill Osiris, Ignorance trying to deprive the
planet of light by hiding its source light in a sarcophagus. By
that time, Osiris had ruled for over twenty-eight years. In the
twenty-ninth year, water covered his coffin. Later on, Isida
learned about the coffin but Seth took out Osiris’ body,
dismembered it into fourteen parts, and threw of the parts across
Egypt. This explains the existence of fourteen Mausoleums of
Osiris in fourteen cities of ancient Egypt. Under Pharaoh
Amenophis XIV (1419–1400 BC), a religious revolution occurred, and
the god of the sun, Atun, became god of all Egypt.

The pharaoh changed his name from Amenhotep (Amun is glad) to
Akhenaten (useful for Atun) and became the supreme priest of the
Atun cult. Atun was represented in the form of the sun disc with
fourteen rays. At the end of these rays were hands holding the
ankh (symbolizing that Atun gave life).

Worship of Atun. Relief in Atun’s temple in
Akhetaten
In ancient Eastern countries, the number fourteen is considered
a numerical expression of space and time. According to Jainism,
the total height of the upper and lower worlds equals fourteen
Radge. One day of Brahman (one Calpa) consists of (fourteen
Manvantars), or fourteen Manu epochs. There is evidence that
ancient peoples developed extensive knowledge in several fields.
Many achievements of that time are not clearly understood even
now. Modern man is struck by structures such as Stonehenge,
Mesoamerican and Egyptian pyramids, the Easter Island statues, and
many other objects, including the Shri-Yantra.

Schematic picture of the Shri-Yantra
The central object of the Shri-Yantra is a fourteen-point star.
Each element of the picture is connected to an aspect of
cosmology. At present, Shri-Yantra is considered a ritual
composition.
The Biblical story of the Flood has Noah and his family
spending 365 days in the ark. God ordered Noah to take seven pairs
of animals and birds to the arc, which when multiplied, equals
fourteen. Here again, we come across the numbers 365 and 14, which
can’t be explained by coincidence.
According to one of mythological versions of the Dogons
(Africa), the world belongs to fourteen Ammans, who rule over
fourteen vertically constructed countries, seven of which are
situated above and seven underneath. In the framework of the
Buddhist philosophy, fourteen is the expression of divine wisdom.
Another example from Japan
Reandzi, a Buddhist temple in Kioto belonging to the Rindzai
sect, was built in 1450 and became a refuge for monks practicing
Zen Buddhism. Since the end of the eighteenth century, the temple
has been on the decline. Many structures have been destroyed by
fire. At present, the fame of the temple is exclusively due to a
garden of stones in one of the wonderful philosophical gardens,
supposed created by Master Soami.
Ryoanji Garden
What do these stones personify? One of the enigmas of the
garden is that, independent of where on the verandah you look, you
will always see fourteen stones. Perhaps Soami was trying to show
the people the infinity of the world, the strength of space, and
the majesty of Buddha, to make them understand that there is much
that is incomprehensible in this world.
The residence of the spiritual leader of Tibet, the Dalai Lama
XIV, is in Dharamsala. The number fourteen is the index number of
Avalokiteshvara’s incarnations, through him personified. All of
Apostle Paul’s messages make up the number fourteen and the sum of
Jewish letters in David’s name equals fourteen. Jesus Christ’s
star of Bethlehem was a fourteen-pointed star.

Fourteen-point star of Jesus Christ
The most interesting fact is that in the forty-sixth chapter of
Grigor Narekatsi’s The Book of Tragedies, referring to the
creation of man, we twice come across the number 365, which is as
if expressed in the responses of Almighty. Narekatsi (951–1003)
lived in the monastery situated on the bank of the Lake Van in
West Armenia. The fact that he proclaims his book “God sent” makes
the comments about the number 365 divine, if we confront our
hypothesis of mathematical cryptogram with words and expressions
from chapter 46, in which he refers to the question of the
creation of a man as if receiving the answer from God:
- “God has created the human from 360 parts, Also he has given
him five sense organs."
- “God has sealed in people, the Solution of this creation,
And in a monument eternal, where knowledge of a body and soul,
It contains a component of time, without the beginning and the
end, And consecutive number of days in one year, That is
expression of will of the creator.”
Then he writes that God added to the number of components the
number of senses, resulting in the number 365—the number of days
in a year.
He also states that the secret of man’s creation can be revealed
via a monument that includes the component of time and constitutes
the number of days of a year.
We know that there are 365 days in a year. After fully analyzing
these lines, we concluded that here, too, the monument could be
the pyramid.
- Abraksas
- The Bible and Enoch
- G. Narekatsi
- 365 days in a year
- Hermes and the Egyptian calendar
- Noah and his family spent 365 days in the Ark
These and other facts played a role in the final choice of the
fourteen-step model of the pyramid as the prototype for the cipher
lost during the Flood. Further research acknowledges the
correctness of our choice, demonstrating that Bible is one of the
pivotal links in the chain of encoded information, thus being
simultaneously the cipher and the key to the cipher. Research of
mathematical models and deciphering keys has led us to our
conclusions. Kepler’s first law states that all planets revolve
around the sun in an elliptical orbit with the sun at one of its
focuses.

Portrait of Johannes Kepler

The energy radiated from the sun is formed by thermonuclear
synthesis, resulting in the formation of one atom of helium (He24)
from four atoms of hydrogen (H11).

Helium is four times heavier than hydrogen. Kepler’s law raises
a question. What is the other focus of a planet’s elliptical
orbit? Man always fixed his eyes on the sun, the moon, and the
stars; there is nothing extraordinary about this. Many nations
worshipped the sun. In ancient Egypt, the god for the sun was
called Kheprer, for “rising sun,” and Ra, for “setting sun” –Atum.
The nine-god system, born in Heliopolis (On), was headed by
Atum, the sun god and creator of life. According to Akhenaten,
Aten was the supreme god. In the course of time, the sun god Ra,
Atum, and Aten merged into one deity.
In the process of mathematical cryptography research, we
concluded that the energy absorbed by the second focus of the
planet’s elliptical orbit is information. Through synthesis in the
second focus, one atom of helium (He24)
forms four atoms of hydrogen (H11), which is
four times lighter than helium. Thermonuclear synthesis radiates
thermal and radioactive energy, but the second synthesis absorbs
energy, and is neither thermal nor radioactive. It is assumed that
the second synthesis absorbs the information separated from the
physical bodies after the death of a biological object, retaining
their life experience so that it is never lost. Any living subject
can be considered to contain information. There should be an
information conservation law, which can be expressed by a
corresponding formula.
We would like to say, that information, the volume of which is
hard to indicate, is encoded in the image of the fourteen-step
pyramid. The carriers of the information are the geometric
compositions, formed by the small pyramids. The geometric
compositions can be plane (2D) or volumetric (3D). Each of the
informational layers has a geometric composition and a numerical
key for the given composition. And the language to decipher the
cryptogram is mathematical logics.
The energy absorbed by the second focus of the elliptical orbit
of the planets differs qualitatively from that radiated by the
sun. That is why the human eye cannot see the second focus.
Perhaps a man starts perceiving the second focus of the elliptical
orbit of the planets only after death. The human body dies, but
what perceives the second focus does not. G. Narekatsi states in
The Book of Tragedies that a man is not a body; the
body is a feeling, accepting vessel of man.
If after the death of a man, something continues to exist and
fixes a reality not available to living people, we do admit that
it may be a human soul? It is said that the soul is immortal. When
the body dies, what separates from the human body? If the soul,
what does it consist of and what it is like? We think life
experience separates from one’s his body after death.
In the course of time, man understood that energy does not get
lost; it just transforms. This resulted in the creation of the law
of conservation of energy. This law of physics has gained
empirical confirmation.
Man understood, too, that substance does not get lost, either;
it transforms from one state to another. This resulted in the
substance conservation law, also empirically confirmed.
The given reality of the world can be correctly evaluated by
its informative value. The principle is as follows: more
information = more experience. The universal experience of mankind
is just a simple component of the divine experience. The day when
the existence of afterworld is accepted is close enough.
When God distributed the seeds of life, he planned how to
recollect souls so that nothing was lost. The immortality of the
human soul may be substantiated or explained within the framework
of the information conservation law. After all, our life is the
vessel that carries out the process and exchange of information.
From that perspective, our life, the processes in society, and the
phenomena in the surrounding world should be considered.

Fourteen-step model HPC is formed of 365
small pyramids
The result of every life is the information or experience
gained. If we accepted the existence of the information
conservation law, the phenomenon of the human soul could be
understood. The immortality of the human soul may be explained
only in the framework of information, or life-experience
conservation. The time when these thoughts will find confirmation
is near.
[ . . . ]
Based on information from the Holy Bible, we have established
that God created the universe, including Adam the Man, and with
exactness determined the period of time during which human kind
must exist on this planet. To determine that period, we must study
the following items.
2 Peter 3:8: “But beloved be not ignorant of this one thing
that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand
years as one day.” Genesis 6:3: “And said the Lord my spirit shall
not always strive with man for that he also is flesh: yet his days
shall be a hundred and twenty years.” Here God determined the
period of existence of human kind on the earth.
So how many days are there in 120 years? It won’t be difficult to
calculate, for we know that one year = 365 days. 120 x 365 = 43800
days.
God allotted man 43800 days. However, we must remember that
these are divine days. Taking into consideration 2 Peter 3:8,
“that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years,” one day =1000
years, It is not difficult to guess that 43800 x 1000 = 43,800,000
years. God allotted humankind 43,800,000 years of existence. See
the Koran 22:46. Here again it is affirmed that one day = 1000
years. According to academic science, man appeared on the earth
about 40 - 50 million years ago. But things are not as simple as
they may seem at first sight. Based on the above facts the second
advent of Jesus Christ will take place at the end of the twentieth
and beginning of the twenty-first century.
Jesus said that on the third day of his crucifixion, he would
rise from the dead. As true believers know, it really happened
like that. Taking into consideration 2 Peter 3:8, “that one day is
with the Lord as a thousand years,” we appear to be right in the
following: Jesus was crucified on Friday, and resurrected on
Sunday. The time between the crucifixion and the resurrection
fluctuates from 46 - 48 hours, but the real space of time between
the crucifixion and the resurrection makes two days or a bit less.
Two days = 2000 years or a bit less. The Christian world will
first hear and then see Jesus Christ. Just as in the Gospel, first
they heard John the Baptist then saw Jesus Christ.
The twenty-first century will witness that happy encounter. All
these events will occur in the third millennium, or on the third
day after Crucifixion of Jesus.
Those from people who need to understand and estimate correctly
Jesus Christ mission, it is necessary to study Joseph's figure of
son Jacob attentively.After all Jesus in memory of people remained
as Joseph's son.Joseph's history of son Jacob slightly opens true
mission Jesus universal .
Joseph's history can help to estimate correctly to us and a course
of historical events before and after Jesus.Joseph's history opens
a historical role and universal mission the Jewish people.
[ . . . ]
Order now
Pyramids of the Great Architect of the Universe
- - -
Copyright 2010 by Petros Petrosyan.
All Rights Reserved
Presented with permission of the author
Pyramids of the Great Architect of the Universe (order
from amazon.com)
by Petros Petrosyan (Author)

Also Available from:
http://www.llumina.com/store/pyramids.htm
and
http://www.booksamillion.com/search?id=4645344234425&query
=Petros+Petrosyan&where=book_author&search.x=60&search.y=9
The Great Pyramids of Egypt have
long interested scholars, travelers, and mystics, all of
whom have arrived at their own interpretations of the
significance and origins of these magnificent structures.
The Arabs call them "Mountains of the Pharaohs." The Middle
Ages wrapped them in a dark cloak of mystery, fantasy, and
secrecy. What is their secret? Why the shape? The height of
the largest pyramid, if multiplied by one billion, equals
the distance from Earth to the sun. The side of its base,
divided by twice its height, equals the approximate value of
pi. What accounts for these coincidences? How is it possible
to calculate the dates of all wars and disasters based on
the dimensions of the Great Pyramid? Read The Pyramids of
the Great Architect of the Universe to learn the answers to
these and other questions about one of the Seven Wonders of
the Ancient World, which still baffles us in today's
scientific age. About the author: Petros Petrosyan is a
nuclear engineer from Armenia. He is a graduate of Yerevan
Engineering University, and is married with two children.
His fascination with the Egyptian pyramids began in 1988,
and his study of pyramidology continues through today.
Petrosyan is also the author of Pyramids: The Key to the
Code of Self-Destruction. |
Related Links
Subject Related Books
Pyramids of the Great Architect of the Universe
by Petros Petrosyan (Author)
Pyramids of Egypt Books and Resources >>
WORTH A LOOK
|
 |
The
Great Pyramid Decoded
by Peter Lemesurier
For over 40 centuries, the Great
Pyramid of Giza has baffled mankind as to its purpose. This book
suggests that the design of the pyramid derives from a simple
number code. When the pyramid is "decoded", the message that
unfolds seems to be a blueprint for mankind that can be compared
with the more recent prophecies of St Malachy, Nostradamus,
Edgar Cayce and others. The author has also uncovered links
between the pyramid's picture of Man's place in the universe and
the religious traditions of Egypt, Palestine, India, and even
Central America. |
This is the book that I've been looking for for a long time! It
describes the measurements of the Pyramid of Giza and decodes them, with
explanations of them too. The result -- prophecies! It's up to you to believe
them or not. It will change your view on the Pyramids, Egyptians, and everything
else. A remarkable and must-read book.
|
 |
From
Atlantis to the Sphinx
by Colin Wilson
The author of numerous books with a New Age bent, including
the best-selling The Outsider, Wilson here presents an
unusual thesis: an ancient civilization, popularly called
Atlantis, transmitted its advanced culture to other ancient
civilizations before disappearing in a worldwide
catastrophe. He examines antique maps, documents,
archaeological records, and historical writings to "prove"
that humankind is older than frequently supposed and that
Atlanteans were the precursors of Egyptians, Aztecs, and
Maya. Wilson also posits the existence of a collective human
consciousness that permitted ancient peoples to work
smoothly with other members of their groups.
|
His most interesting (and believable) statement is that the
Sphinx shows signs of water damage, an indication that it is
much older than "experts" say. This volume, which bears
comparison to John West's Serpent in the Sky (1979),
presents its theories in a sober and readable manner.
Suitable for public libraries.?Norman Malwitz, Queens
Borough P.L., Jamaica, N.Y. Copyright 1997 Reed Business
Information, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|