|
The Big Puzzles of the Universe
By Eugene Savov, author of Theory of Interaction
Summary: The discoveries at the
outskirts of the accessible universe strongly question the big bang
theory and ask for challenging alternatives. The confusing findings
of galaxies when the big bang universe was less than 5% of its age
are consistent with my “firework universe” that had lumpy
fireworks like beginning, created from discovered 3D-spiral swirls
of basic matter that ejected smaller ones from their cores. The one
existing and unique “firework universe” has a center, which is
like hyper huge atomic nucleus that ejected smaller ones that did
the same and so on. In this way the 3D-spiral swirls of basic matter
unfolded to smaller scales to create the fabric of reality. We are
living on the surface of a gigantic nucleus called Earth, from whose
kernel the atomic nuclei that build us were cast away in the moment
of the Earth’s creation. Initially the Earth was bright blue star
that cooled with the extinction of the source of atomic nuclei in
its core. The production of new atoms in the innermost depths of the
Earth makes its interior hot and accounts for its volcanic activity
and lava upwelling mid ocean ridge.
The Hubble Ultra Deep Field discoveries of galaxies at fringes of
the observable universe send the big bang theory in its next age
crisis. There was simply not enough time after the big bang for
these galaxies to form. The big bang was born from a point that can
be infinitely dense, called singularity. Why did it come at all and
what was the universe before the big bang is pretty uncertain. This
makes the current understanding of the universe incomplete. The
piling of puzzling observations at the outskirts of the observable
universe asks for reconsideration of its current picture and for
development of alternative theories. The content of the big bang
universe is 4% Atoms (visible matter), 23% Cold Dark Matter, 73%
Dark Energy [1]. We do not know what the dark matter is. The even
more mysterious dark energy appears to account for the perplexing
acceleration of the big bang universe expansion. How can one take
seriously singularity allowing picture of the universe in which
about of 96% of its content is uncertain? The increase of the number
of mysteries from the near and distant space suggests that the
fundamentals of current knowledge are erroneous and hence the big
bang is wrong. The accumulation of paradoxes and big puzzles in
the framework of modern physics indicates a need for its
reconsideration and setup in a broader basic background.
Einstein’s general relativity and quantum mechanics present
more than half-century old portrait of the universe at macro and
micro scales. The current understanding of the universe is
essentially incomplete. We have no idea what was the universe before
the big bang. What will come out of it as it ages is also
controversial. The picture of the universe is based on four
scale-dependent, seen as fundamental, interactions - gravitational,
electromagnetic, weak and strong. These interactions work,
respectively, between the space bodies, atoms and in the atomic
nuclei.
About 10exp(26) atoms build one’s mind and their interaction
place us somewhere between the seen as deterministic and
probabilistic realities of classical physics and quantum mechanics.
What creates what we see, including what we perceive as space and
time, is a deep puzzle, which has been addressed since dawn of
civilisation. Democritus (about 460-370 BC) believed that nature is
made of indivisible particles called atoms. The advance of science
into the structure of matter showed that atoms are made of electrons
and nuclei bounded by electromagnetic interactions. The nuclei were
split in atom crackers in a way that indicated underlying discrete
structure, made of strongly coupled protons and neutrons. The
high-energy collisions between protons and electrons showed that the
protons also have a discrete structure, which is considered to be
built from quarks. The quarks are puzzling enough because they can
be found only in bounded states.
The more we dig into the structure of matter the more we find as
we use greater energies for the acceleration of the colliding
particles. It seems like never ending quest for the building blocks
of nature. Modern physics considers structureless fundamental
particles, which are born from uncertain matter antimatter
asymmetry, appearing a singularity allowing big bang universe
beginning. Should matter complicate inward, toward its source, or we
simply create complications, like the observed diversity of
fundamental particles, as we enter the intimate depths of nature
riding on faster and faster colliding particles. Modern physics [2]
shows only how nature appears in one’s mind. Why things occur as
they do can be told only in the terms of their discovered structure.
So the quest for this all-explaining structure goes on.
We live in a universe full of similarities. For example, we see
similar galaxies, stars, planets and elements in the near and
distant universe. The behaviours of the forms of life are similar.
They all seek to feed, to mate and so to propagate, which means to
exist. The universal similarities make nature accessible to mind
[3]. For example, we can study genetics on short living creatures
like plants, fruit flies and mice. We can feed fruit flies with
genetically modified foods and so assess the effect of these foods
after many generations. The omnipresent similarities of bodies and
behaviours suggest a self-similar underlying structure that is a key
toward a complete scale-independent picture of the universe [3]. Lee
Smolin argues that the underlying structure of nature is to be found
in the logic of evolution [4]. This bold idea has a deep unexplored
potential in a universe that shows ubiquitous similarities. For
instance, you may consider the omnipresent synchronisation.
Fireflies set their lights in synchronisation, girls living in one
room synchronise their menstrual periods [5] and we also sing and
dance in synchronisation. If a given property persists in far
different objects, then it is very likely that this property arises
from the fabric of reality. The self-similarity [3], the craving of
nature for synchronisation [5], the persistence of spiral shapes [6,
7, 3] and the similar behaviours of different forms of life, all
these indicate a set of basic properties yet to be studied.
The patterns of nature show striking similarities, which are hard
to understand in the current scale dependent classical and quantum
descriptions. Swarms of bets, birds, fishes or mosquitoes move like
drops or waves of fluid. It looks as these far different creatures
show enigmatic collective behaviour, which is similar to that of
fluid molecules. Somehow this pattern of interaction persists along
the micro and macro scales – producing similar shapes like clouds
of mosquitoes and clouds of smoke. It seems that everybody does the
same at scales of its own [3]. The sources of interaction
synchronise into larger sources that do the same. Thus multiscale
sources of interaction are created, some seen as molecules others as
forms of life.
The universal self-similarity suggests a self-similar underlying
structure that will offer a simpler scale-invariant description of
nature. This description accounts for what we see as space, time,
cosmic bodies, atoms and light [3]. The principle of parsimony,
known as Occam’s razor [8], supports the simpler description of
nature. This fundamental principle requires not doing with more,
e.g. with more assumptions, what can be done with less. Hence the
simpler theory has a basic advantage until proven wrong. So
the big bang theory sent into oblivion the steady state theory of
the universe. It offered a simpler explanation of the discovered
cosmic microwave background as a relic radiation left after the big
bang. The iteration of simple rules can generate complex behaviours
[e.g., 9-11]. This basic finding suggests that there is an
underlying simplicity in nature and multiple interactions
(iterations, computations) can create the observed diversity in
one’s mind. Moreover there is universal equivalence between the
bodies when they are described in the terms of their discovered
fractal like 3D-spiral structure [3]. Stephen Wolfram’s principle
of computational equivalence [11] and Einstein’s energy and mass
equivalence are just two cases of the revealed universal
equivalence. Wolfram’s insights are amazingly deep when he
considers the universal application of simple rules in the observed
complexity buildup.
The similar shapes and behaviours hint that the long sought
unifying interaction should be scale-independent and so it will
account for the observed complexity of nature with simple laws. Then
the universe and its perplexed by discoveries observer will
originate from scale-independent interactions, whose self-similarity
suggests an underlying fractal like structure [3]. The properties of
the whole can be found in one that belongs to a self-similar
(fractal like) construction. Hence the final revelation will be in
finding the universe in one that is in one’s underlying structure.
It turns out that the universe has a 3D-spiral code, which is in
each of its bits like the DNA double helix is in every cell of life
[3]. Lee Smolin is right the logic of evolution is a key to
understanding the universe.
The singularity in the big bang universe beginning suggests that
the big bang is wrong. The big bang is just a complicated stage in
the understanding of the universe like the Ptolemaeus’ (about
100-170 AD) epicycles. The discovered 3D-spiral fabric of reality
shows that the 3D-spiral building blocks of the universe unfold to
smaller ones, thus simply explaining structure buildup at all
scales. Nature is made of huge 3D-spiral basic bricks that
create similar ones in their wombs rather than from elementary
particles created in assumptions charged big bang universe
beginning. The only assumption in Eugene Savov’s theory of
interaction is that something exists, the rest is a simple
qualitative reasoning. The theory of interaction removes the
singularity in the universe beginning and presents a
“firework universe” to challenge the big bang.
Eugene Savov shows that space, time and everything are the way in
which we see multiscale 3D-spiral basic blocks of nature. We find in
our senses more than what is enough for a proper description of
reality. The created redundancy in the process of perception baffles
one’s mind.
Something exists, some form of matter, independent of how we see
it. It does exist. It attracts itself. Then it bounces back and
tears smaller ones from its structure, thus creating the finite
sources of reality according to Eugene Savov’s theory of
interaction. All you need to understand this theory is your inborn
capability for simple logical reasoning.
Eugene Savov’s theory of interaction does not reject the modern
physics. This qualitatively new theory simply shows how the laws and
the principles of the classical and quantum physics can be derived
from the revealed fractal like fabric of reality, when it is
perceived at the scales of the process of observation [3]. Therefore
the theory of interaction broadens the understanding of nature up to
the discovered frames of existence.
The universe is made of 3D-spiral swirls of basic matter that
eject like fireworks smaller ones from their nuclei. In this way the
“firework universe” had a lumpy beginning that simply accounts
for the discovered normal galaxies and heavy elements at the fringes
of the accessible cosmos and also for the enigmatic dark matter [3].
Eugene Savov’s “firework universe” is made of large
building blocks that cast away smaller ones from their cores,
instead from seen as elementary particles that are believed to be
born from mysterious matter-antimatter asymmetry, created in even
more uncertain big bang universe beginning. The initiation of cosmic
structure buildup in the big bang universe is poorly understood. The
discovered huge 3D-spiral basic bricks of matter set their offspring
in motion around their nuclei and so account for the enigmatic dark
matter of the universe. We see only the inner parts of the bodies
because they move faster inward and thus become denser and visible
[3].
The just born “firework universe” was made of 3D-spiral
sources of unifying interaction, i.e. 3D-spiral swirls of basic
matter that ejected smaller ones from their cores and drove them
around with their outer 3D-spirally moving structure [3]. The
“firework universe” is made of multiscale nuclei that cast away
smaller ones that move around their sources all moving around the
hyper huge 3D-spiral nucleus of the universe. The 3D-spiral
contractions and expansions of the fabric of reality make it finite
and its picture complete, while the big bang theory allows
singularity in the universe beginning and so presents incomplete
picture of the universe.
The universe is made of 3D-spiral swirls of interaction or in
other words 3D-spiral swirls of “basic matter”. The swirls fold
and unfold ejecting smaller ones from their cores. Thus the observed
structure of reality is created in a way simpler than what the
so-called elementary particles can offer. These particles are born
from mysterious matter-antimatter asymmetry that appeared in even
more enigmatic big bang, when the universe came from nothing. Why
the big bang universe came at all is pretty puzzling. Eugene
Savov’s theory of interaction considers the big WHY of current
knowledge [3].
Prediction No. 1: Observer in the “firework universe” will
see galaxies, light and heavy elements at all cosmic scales [3].
Confirmation of Prediction No. 1: The discoveries of galaxies
[12-15], string of galaxies [16, 17] and heavy elements [18] in the
far distant universe confirm Eugene Savov’s “firework
universe” and the revealed 3D-spiral code of nature. The latter
shows how galaxies, light and heavy elements were born from one
3D-spiral structure that suddenly ejected smaller ones from its
core, the smaller ones did the same and so on [3]. Light came last
in the space created from the much larger sources of interaction
[3].
The structure of reality unfolds at basic level to smaller scales
instead of being made from small elementary particles that generated
dark matter problem and cannot simply account for the observed
clumpiness of matter at cosmic scales [3].
“Astronomers believe large galaxies grew slowly, merging with
and consuming small
galaxies over billions of years. But two researchers are suggesting
this occurred
faster than astronomers thought. They've found that relatively large
galaxies — those the size of our own Milky Way Galaxy — were already present within
a billion years of the Big Bang. [12]”
The discovered most distant galaxies and very distant string of
galaxies are consistent with a lumpy universe beginning. The
“firework universe” began with sudden ejection of enormous
3D-spiral lumps. They similarly ejected smaller ones from their
cores. The smaller ones did the same and so on. In this way the
basic bricks of nature unfolded to smaller scales in something like
all-building cosmic turbulence that accounts in the simplest way for
everything as shown in Eugene Savov’s theory of interaction [3].
The discoveries of normal galaxies and heavy elements at the
fringes of the accessible space question the current understanding
of the universe [12-15, 18]. These rather confusing
discoveries have to be added to the many confirmations of Eugene
Savov’s “firework universe” in which galaxies, light and heavy
elements should be observed at all cosmic scales [3].
The accessible universe is like a cosmic cloud that is observed
from an “electron” called Earth that orbits an “atomic
nucleus” - the Sun that similarly moves around its source – the
nucleus of our Galaxy that similarly moves around its source – the
Great Attractor [19] and so on. All move around the discovered
center of the universe – one hyper huge 3D-spiral nucleus from
which the smaller ones were cast away in fireworks like mode of one
existing and unique universe creation [3].
The river of galaxies that indicates existence of a pull from
mysterious dark matter [19] is driven by the outer 3D-spiral
structure of the Great Attractor in which the river of galaxies is
merged. Similarly, the much smaller 3D-spirial structure, seen as
the gas giant planet Jupiter, drives its outer atomic shell to
create the observed perplexing latitudinal wind bands. The river
galaxies is like a wind belt of a gas giant planet, both driven by
the outer 3D-spiral structure of their sources.
The creation of new atomic matter, i.e. much smaller 3D-spiral
swirls, in the discovered nuclei of stars, planets and planetary
like moons makes the interiors of these space bodies hot. Every body
expands from its source. The expansion of the very small 3D-spiral
swirls, seen as light, along their long trip from the distant
galaxies creates the cosmic redshift [3]. The theory of interaction
explains the phenomena in the terms of their revealed structure
rather than with analogies taken from better-observed phenomena. For
example, the cosmic redshift is considered in the big bang theory as
Doppler effect, which is inferred from the observed increase or
decrease of the sound frequency that comes from the whistle of a
train that draws near or moves away. Eugene Savov’s theory of
interaction tells what creates the observation itself in the terms
of its discovered underlying structure.
Prediction No. 2: It is very likely that the number density of
the most distant galaxies, which will be found around four mutually
perpendicular lines of sight, would show some anisotropy, which
depending on the size of the observed part of the sky will be
created from the source of the accessible “firework universe” or
from the sources of these most distant galaxies. Similarly, the
density of an atmospheric cloud increases earthward - toward the
discovered giant atomic like nucleus of the Earth that ejected a
great number of very much smaller atomic nuclei in the first moments
of the observed universe creation [3]. The atomic and galactic
nuclei are created similarly at scales of their own. They were all
cast away from 3D-spirally contracting and expanding, i.e.
vibrating, larger ones. These far different in size nuclei are seen
as atmospheric clouds and as a cloud of galaxies, which is known as
the accessible universe.
The just born “firework universe” was made of multiscale
bright blue stars [3]. The smaller moved around their sources - the
larger ones. The larger moved around their sources – the galactic
nuclei. All moved around their most initial source, the
grand-grand-…mother of everybody that is the revealed 3D-spiral
nucleus of the universe in which the basic matter remains always
finite by 3D-spiral contractions and expansions. The cooling of this
“firework universe” created the cosmic microwave background
radiation and its structure, seen as hotter spots that should have
the sizes of the 3D-spiral sources of galaxies. The cooling of the
smaller stars created what we see now as planets and planetary like
moons [3].
Prediction No. 3: The cosmic microwave background anisotropy
has to have angular scale associated with the sources of galaxies,
which are very massive objects of Great Attractor [19] type. The
angular anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation
should have a peak that corresponds to the space scale created from
the discovered sources of galaxies. This space scale is larger than
that of the galactic clusters and smaller than that of the universe.
Prediction 3 originates from the discovered 3D-spiral code of nature
and is well in agreement with observation - “Previous ideas had
suggested that, once the subsequent history of the Universe is
accounted for, the distribution of fluctuations would be independent
of scale. However, the current results show that the fluctuations
are most apparent at an angular scale of about ½ degree, the size
of the Moon in the night sky. On both larger (the size of the
Universe) and smaller (the size of a cluster of galaxies) scales,
these variations in density and temperature are much less [20,
21].” The confirmation of Prediction No. 3 is given in the figure
described as "The angular power spectrum of CMB anisotropies
measured by the VSA. The structure of the spectrum exhibits the
characteristic peak-trough behaviour indicative of adiabatic initial
conditions from inflation." in the link [20].
Prediction No. 4: The discovered 3D-spiral structure of
reality will allow obtaining elegant solutions of physical and
mathematical problems after their expression in its universal terms
[3].
According to Eugene Savov’s theory of interaction the fabric of
reality is made of 3D-spirally contracting and expanding (vibrating,
oscillating) swirls of basic matter that create the finite building
blocks of one existing and unique “firework universe”. These
swirls move faster inward and thus become denser inward. So some
become visible toward their nuclei. The universe has a center that
is like hyper huge atomic nucleus from which smaller similar nuclei
spawn. These smaller nuclei do the same and so on. The galactic
nuclei, the atomic nuclei, the electrons and the light are just some
of the created multiscale nuclei, the centers of the multiscale
3D-spiral swirls of basic matter that build the structure of the
universe. The expansion of the 3D-spiral structure of light as it
ages traveling from the distant galaxies creates the cosmic
redshift. Everything expands as it comes from its source [3]. That
is because the laws of interaction, which are the long sought rules
of creation, are independent of the sizes of the coupling bodies.
The discovered multiscale 3D-spiral basic bricks of matter are
simply described at the scales of observation with the laws and
principles of modern physics.
The creation of new atomic nuclei in the Earth’s center makes
its atomic shell thicker, the Earth expands [22] and its rotation
slows down, that is the length of the day increases as the Earth
ages [3] in accordance with some geological studies [23]. The
production of new atomic nuclei from the giant 3D-spiral nucleus of
the Earth keeps its interiors hot and accounts for the lava
upwelling mid ocean ridge and the volcanic activity. We are made of
star like atoms, born from the huge nucleus of our planet in the
moment of its ejection from the grater nucleus of the Sun. The Earth
and the other planets are small stars whose surfaces had cooled long
before the appearance of life and consciousness in this world. We
are made of atomic size stars [3, 24].
The universe is like a hyper huge atom whose nucleus ejected
smaller ones that similarly did the same and so on. The universe is
made of multiscale 3D-spiral swirls of basic matter, whose cores
depending on their size are seen as galactic nuclei, stars, planets,
atoms, electrons and light. The sources of all-building interaction
are spawned from the hyper huge nucleus of the discovered one
existing and unique “firework universe” [3].
The universe is one hyper huge 3D-spiral swirl of basic matter
whose multiscale contractions and expansions generate smaller ones
that similarly do the same. The interaction of the produced
multiscale 3D-spiral building blocks of matter creates its puzzling
clumpy structure at every scale. Matter moves faster inward in its
3D-spiral swirls thus making them denser inward. The cores of some
swirls are dense enough to be visible like stars, planets, atoms,
and light.
Everything contracts and expands, oscillates, vibrates and so
looks for a partner to synchronize and thus to unfold its structure
(energy) in a process called universal scale fitting [3]. Fireflies
cluster on trees and walls [5], galaxies make clusters, strings and
walls, we sing choirs, etc. Thus bodies synchronize the interactions
that build them and so expand in what are seen as puzzling pattern
formation, self-organization and appearance of life [3].
Matter moves 3D-spirally faster inward and so oscillates at higher
frequencies inward [3]. Space and time and everything else are just
how we see the multiscale 3D-spiral fractal like fabric of reality
[3]. Once we have a proper qualitative understanding of nature we
can develop more accurate mathematical models.
The universe is a harmony of 3D-spiral swirls of basic matter.
The higher tones come from the nuclei of the larger ones. Look for
harmony and fun in the outer atomic shell of the huge nucleus called
Earth.
Copyright 2004 by Eugene Savov.
Printed with permission.
Eugene Savov website:
http://www.eugenesavov.com
References
- NASA_WMAP-Winning
Theories
- Davies,
P., The New Physics, 1992
- Savov,
E., Theory of Interaction the Simplest Explanation of
Everything, 2002
- Smolin,
L., The Life of the Cosmos, Oxford University Press, 1997
- Strogatz,
S., Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order, 2003
- Cook,
T.A., The Curves of Life, Dover Pubns, 1979
- Ball,
P., Self-Made Tapestry, Oxford University Press, 1998
- Principia
Cybernetica Web: Occam's Razor
- Strogatz,
St. H., Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, Perseus Publishing, 1994
- Alligood,
K., T. Sauer and J. A. Yorke eds., Chaos, Springer Verlag, 1996
- Wolfram,
S., A New Kind of Science, Wolfram Media, Inc., 2002
- Astronomy:
Science News Article "Galaxies - Distant Milky
Ways"
- Astronomy:
Science News Article " Record Breaking Galaxies"
- Astronomy
Article: "Farthest Galaxy Provides Baby Picture of the
Universe"
- NASA:
Hubble
News Centre - "Hubble's Deepest View Ever ..."
- http://au.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0311279
- NASA
- Goddard Space Flight Center: "GIANT GALAXY STRING
DEFIES MODELS OF HOW UNIVERSE EVOLVED"
- Astronomy
Article: "lron Adds Wrinkle to Universe"
- http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/gclusters/attractor.html
- http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/news/vsa2/
- http://www.ras.org.uk/html/press/jod0402.html
- http://users.indigo.net.au/don/links.html
-
Williams, G. E., Geological constraints on the Precambrian
history
of Earth’s rotation and the Moon’s orbit, Reviews of
Geophysics,
Vol. 38, No. 1, 37-59, 2000.
-
MADE OF ATOMIC SIZE STARS IN A CLUMPY FIREWORK UNIVERSE
http://www.world-mysteries.com/toi_esavov.htm
Related BooksR
|
 |
Theory
of Interaction the Simplest Explanation of Everything
by Eugene Savov |
|
Book Description
The proposed, third for the last one hundred years, picture of the
universe lacks the basic flaws of the big bang theory and explains many
puzzling observations in the near and distant space. A small part of the
book requires a space physics background, while most of it is written in a
highly explanatory, sometimes entertaining, language. This makes the
presented ideas and findings accessible to non-scientists and scientists
of all persuasions. It is shown that complexity originates in the
observer's mind from the discovered amazingly simple structure of reality.
The book asks too many questions, gives answers, tells attractive puzzles
and extraordinary predictions. Everybody interested in the origin of the
universe, life and mind will be deeply thrilled by the disclosed
counterintuitive simplicity of nature. The simplicity of explanation can
be challenged only with a greater simplicity because of the principle of
economy, which is a basic tool in science, technology and engineering.
This principle says that it is a vanity to do with more what can be done
with less. Nothing is simpler than one self-reproducing interaction, whose
multiscale similar outcomes account for everything. The author discovered
this spirally contracting and expanding interaction and the consequent
fireworks like universe beginning in 1991. The book brings to light his
surprising findings and their confirmation by considerations and too many
observations. It is well known that nothing is more practical than a good
theory. So the improvement of the quality of life depends on the advance
of knowledge. The revealed firework universe rocks with its stunning
self-consistence as it lucidly explains the perplexing matter-antimatter
asymmetry, the normal galaxies at the fringes of the observable universe,
the creation of galaxies, stars and planets, the origin of life,
consciousness and many other enigmatic phenomena.
|
|
Related
Books by Other Authors >>
|
|
