The Theory of Everything Earth Changing
by Arthur "Art" Ryan
The quest for a Theory of Everything has been the mission
cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and countless other
scientists for a great many years. Thus far, no one individual has
put a finger on the elusive answer that would tell us how
everything in the Universe works. Many have given little pieces of
information to the big picture and even more have then included
these snippets into their thoughts on the matter.
This pursuit has employed these people for years and has been
the monetary target of vast amounts of money. Cooperative efforts
among different countries has even resulted in a huge particle
accelerator being built that crosses sovereign borders. For the
most part, every accredited scientist’s ideas, theories, and
possibly quacky thoughts get consideration. After all, “Cause and
Effect” can be extremely hard to determine and with the Universe
as the effect, we must be able to determine the cause given enough
Granted, many a scientist has met with hostility when
expressing their theories. Just ask Joao Magueijo, a theoretical
physicist, how his theory of a Variable Speed of Light did with
Yet, the community did review his thoughts before dismissing them.
This, however, has not been the case with regard to reviews
centered on Crustal Shift. This theory, that has only been
presented by brave individuals outside their normal discipline,
has met with violent opposition since the 1950’s. While Albert
Einstein was “Electrified” by the theory as presented by Charles
H. Hapgood. Nearly every other accredited scientist has merely
scoffed at the idea. Imagine the iconic Einstein has been
indirectly told that he was wrong. No one in the science community
would even quietly think that E=MC2 was wrong for fear
that someone might find out. Further, on his endorsement of
Hapgood’s theory, we are told that Einstein was just entertaining
a crazy thought.
Can this be true?
These same people that automatically dismiss the Crust Shift
Theory; calling its supporters uneducated and pushing publications
on the subject to the shelves reserved for the lunatic fringe,
fail to answer flaws in their own theories. As an example, the
theory of tectonic plate shifting fails to address the cause for
such a movement. Here are a couple of very specific area questions
that are ignored in the theory.
How did Scotland move from the equatorial regions of this
planet to end up in its present location when centrifugal force
should have moved it the other way?
What unseen and immeasurable force pushed this island country
through all of the other tectonic plates that would have been
fighting to remain in place?
Remember, a body at rest will remain at rest until an outside
force moves it. Almost all of the other plates would be and are
acting like door stoppers. Visualize a little hunk of wood or
rubber shoved under the bottom of a door. It weights just a few
ounces, yet it holds back a door many times its weight. You can
even add your own body weight by pushing on the door and the
leverage of the stopper holds its ground. Well, so would the other
tectonic plates. Even those located on the bottom of the ocean
will resist the movement. In order to get tectonic plate
shifting/movement, a certain set of circumstances must be in place
that capitalize on centrifugal force to allow movement. These
circumstances are easily identifiable and the resulting movement
In the book “Are We Worth Our Salt?”, a chapter has been
written on the current (present day) tectonic plate movement that
can be easily measured Now! The circumstances required and the
resulting movement is outlined in the chapter untitled “Continental
Drift - Pangaea in Reverse”. The outside force necessary for this
movement is caused by the friction generated by the Earth’s
rotation. This friction exerts force, in an easterly direction, on
the plates in differing degrees enabling a reduction in the
ability of the Earth’s crust to hold back magma. This reduction
creates areas of least resistance allowing for expansion. We see
this area now as the Pacific Rim and the Marianas Trench. While
this suggests that large scale tectonic plate movement is possible
it must be pointed out that the movement is slow and in a singular
direction. For more on the cause of this force that results in
earthquakes and volcanoes refer to
http://sciencedoubt.blogspot.com where you will find a
posting on the creation of tectonic plate stress.
Let’s get back to the subject of Scotland. The thoughts of
Geologists, Paleontologists, and others, who seem to hold the
educational background to be “in the know”, have towards that
landmass having been in the equatorial region at one time can not
be disputed. The evidence proves that. Dinosaur footprints
fossilized there tell us that cold blooded reptiles lived in the
region despite an environment that hostile now. So, with the above
information in mind we know that Scotland was much closer to the
equator in the distant past.
Further support for a crust shift comes with the discovery of
Predator “X” in Northern Norway. There can be no doubt that this
aquatic reptilian dinosaur could not live in frigid cold water for
very long. This animal may have been a lone wanderer who got lost
and perished; however, the Scottish findings suggest otherwise.
Both of these examples raise yet another set of questions that
are not answered by the traditional tectonic plate movement theory
and are probably ignored because they lends so much support to the
theory of crust shift. These questions are: How were the fossils
even created, what process steps took place in their creation, and
why did scavengers not devour or scatter the bodies?
Many researchers and authors have given additional evidence
that landmasses as we know them are not how they were. The most
popular topic seems to be the wooly mammoth in Siberia. Hugh A.
Brown, Allen W. Eckert, and Charles H. Hapgood have described this
world mystery and how it supports a planetary shift either in
total or just as a crust slide. This shift must have been quick in
its execution in order to catch these animals off guard. These
spectacular writers have presented and refined the theory with
well supported evidence that, unlike their counterparts (most of
the earth science community), does not require a defiance of
physical laws to culminate. Where these gentlemen join the others
is in a lack of a “Cause” for the “Effect” they describe.
Enter the book “Are We Worth Our Salt?” by Arthur Ryan.
An easy read that identifies oddities and physical impossibilities
in our current, widely accepted thoughts on Earth Changes. It
render support to the Crust Shift Theory by providing a “Cause”
that uses the limits of physical law as its boundaries. Addressing
fossil creation, the formation of the Grand Canyon, Continental
Drift, the anomalies of salt flats, the Dead Sea and others
topics, it identifies a cyclic process that readily explains the
changes in Global temperatures; be it warming or cooling and
removes man from the primary cause of these fluctuations. As
suggested by the title, it involves the desalination of the
Earth’s oceans. Researched and written to support the Crust Shift
phenomena, it stumbled upon a Theory of Everything Earth Changing.
Copyright by Art Ryan
Presented with permission of the author
About the Author
Arthur “Art” Ryan is an independent researcher and
author, who is a full-time employee supporting a major railroad
and a small business owner of a process engineering consulting
company, that enjoys all manner of things science. He is a
baseball and football fan, who values his privacy and therefore
writes under a pseudonym.
His book concerning Earth Changes is called “Are We
Worth Our Salt?” which can be purchased through Lulu by visiting
Amazon and may be procured at you local Barnes and Noble
Art accepts constructive criticism about his ideas
and welcomes evidence that support or dispute his thoughts.
Questions and comments can be addressed to Art through his
At his site, Art has opened a controlled, closed
forum where intellectuals, professionals, academics, and aspiring
amateurs can express their thoughts, findings, and alternate
theories under pseudonyms; thereby avoiding possible damage to
their careers or loss of existing funding. This site is to be
driven by its users and will grow to fit the need. Those
interested in writing on Science Doubt are invited to review the
“Outstanding Questions” and “News Articles” sections for topic
ideas or to contact the editor about your own.
Are We Worth Our Salt?
Have you ever wondered what is behind some of the World's
mysteries? Do you ponder Earth changes and natural climate
swings? If so, this is a book for you. Addressed herein is a
primary thought that when first published by another author
"electrified" Albert Einstein.
Yet, a cause for the theory was not previously given. This
book will show the process steps needed to bring it to
culmination. A cause and effect approach will be brought
into play to solve this dramatic puzzle. Our Civilization is
on the line and it requires your assistance to save it. Are
you up to the challenge?
Also available here: